On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Steve Jenkins <stevejenkins_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
> Where in the source is it determined where libstrl.so.* is written on
> "make install?" In the CentOS packaged version's spec file, I include
> "%{_libdir}/libstrl.so.*" in the libopendkim "%flies" section, which
> overrides whatever the source's Makefile settings are and writes the file
> to /usr/lib on install. I'm poking around the source now, but I don't know
> enough about what I'm looking for to know what it is I'm looking for. :)
>
Wanting to get to the bottom of this, I just fired up a completely vanilla
CentOS 6 VM, downloaded OpenDKIM 2.8.2 from SourceForge, and did
"./configure" then "make" then "make install" with NO additional flags or
options.
Attached to this message are output logs from each of these three commands.
Also, after the "make install," here are the contents of the /usr/local/lib
directory:
# ls -ls /usr/local/lib
total 832
464 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 472404 Apr 16 18:06 libopendkim.a
4 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1002 Apr 16 18:06 libopendkim.la
0 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 20 Apr 16 18:06 libopendkim.so ->
libopendkim.so.9.0.0
0 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 20 Apr 16 18:06 libopendkim.so.9 ->
libopendkim.so.9.0.0
340 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 345753 Apr 16 18:06 libopendkim.so.9.0.0
8 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 4276 Apr 16 18:06 libstrl.a
4 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 915 Apr 16 18:06 libstrl.la
0 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 Apr 16 18:06 libstrl.so ->
libstrl.so.1.0.0
0 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 Apr 16 18:06 libstrl.so.1 ->
libstrl.so.1.0.0
8 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 6745 Apr 16 18:06 libstrl.so.1.0.0
4 drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 Apr 16 18:06 pkgconfig
So I'm declaring that bug report bogus. User must be doing something
non-standard with the configure options, or have something non-default on
his overriding the default settings.
SteveJ
Received on Tue Apr 16 2013 - 16:25:53 PST