Re: Authentication-Results header

From: Steve Fatula <compconsultant_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:58:37 -0700 (PDT)

----- Original Message -----

> From: Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_cloudmark.com>
> To: "opendkim-users_at_lists.opendkim.org" <opendkim-users_at_lists.opendkim.org>
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 4:47 PM
> Subject: RE: Authentication-Results header
>

>> Is there any way to make it "tidier". I have other tools I'd
> like to
>> use to help rate messages based on this header, but, it contains more
>> info than I want for that purpose (the tool takes the entire header and
>> splits into words). I saw the configuration to remove the b header,
>> which I did. What I'd like to not have in the header also is the host
>> name, and, the header.i
>>
>> This would leave only the dkim= and the dkim-adsp=, which would be
>> ideal for my purposes.
>
> The hostname is mandatory, per RFC5451.
>
> What do you do if the message had multiple signatures?  Without header.i or
> header.d, you don't know which one the Authentication-Results field is
> referencing.
>

Don't care for this purpose. i.e., the tool (spam rating) will end up eventually figuring out if there is any correlation between dkim or adsp results and spam. The d and i just clutter things.

So, there is no way to simply add another (different) header then with just the results?
Received on Wed Aug 10 2011 - 21:58:50 PST