RE: Authentication-Results header

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_cloudmark.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:47:47 -0700

> -----Original Message-----
> From: opendkim-users-bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org [mailto:opendkim-users-bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org] On Behalf Of Steve Fatula
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 1:46 PM
> To: opendkim-users_at_lists.opendkim.org
> Subject: Authentication-Results header
>
> Is there any way to make it "tidier". I have other tools I'd like to
> use to help rate messages based on this header, but, it contains more
> info than I want for that purpose (the tool takes the entire header and
> splits into words). I saw the configuration to remove the b header,
> which I did. What I'd like to not have in the header also is the host
> name, and, the header.i
>
> This would leave only the dkim= and the dkim-adsp=, which would be
> ideal for my purposes.

The hostname is mandatory, per RFC5451.

What do you do if the message had multiple signatures? Without header.i or header.d, you don't know which one the Authentication-Results field is referencing.
Received on Wed Aug 10 2011 - 21:47:55 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 29 2012 - 23:20:19 PST