Re: Another idea of a stat to track

From: Graham Murray <graham_at_gmurray.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:44:35 +0100

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk_at_blackops.org> writes:

> On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> That was an oversight and it should be fixed. I'll try to do that
>> for Beta3.
>
> Done.

Unfortunately this seems to have broken anonymous statistics signature
records. The signer is now showing a hash, but many of the other fields
in the line are corrupted.

Se2aa8f335f9faa40448ccdfc5c951f71 936022014 -1405331651 -9277195 1 1 0 28 0 0 0 0 -2092348233 0 0 0 1400663674 - -

With non-anonymized statistics (from the same server) all looks OK.

Sgmail.com 1 1 1 0 0 0 -1 1 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 -1 domainkey-signature:received:received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id -
Received on Mon Sep 13 2010 - 12:44:46 PST