RE: 2.2.0.Beta2: reporting problems

> -----Original Message-----
> From: opendkim-dev-bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org [mailto:opendkim-dev-
> bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org] On Behalf Of Andreas Schulze
> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 3:23 PM
> To: opendkim-dev_at_lists.opendkim.org
> Subject: 2.2.0.Beta2: reporting problems
>
> [...]
> My own opendkim-2.2.0.Beta2 verifier informs me, that a modiefied
> message
> was received. This mail says:
> "
> DKIM failure report for job ... on <myhostname>
>
> The canonicalized form of the failed message's header and body are
> attached.
> "
>
> But there is no body attached. Only my headers a attached !?

The text is probably misleading. The report actually contains the body in the report part, encoded as "DKIM-Canonicalized-Body" in base64. See opendkim/tests/t-verify-report.txt for an example from one of our unit tests.

> Second issue:
> I have a adsp-record, telling I'm signing all mail.
> $ dig _adsp._domainkey.andreasschulze.de txt +short
> "dkim=all\; r=dkim+adsp"
>
> I also request a mail in case of any violation. Again my own
> opendkim-2.2.0.Beta2 verifier tries to inform me about. But the wrong
> recipientaddress is constructed:
> instead of dkim+adsp_at_andreasschulze.de opendkim-2.2.0.Beta2 sends
> the report goes to dkim+adsp_at_users.spamassasin.org which is the
> recipientdomain
> of my first mail to the mailinglist.
>
> I think I reported a similiar failure to murray...

Can you post your configuration file? My guess is there's a sender domain override in effect, and it uses that to construct the report destination.
Received on Tue Sep 14 2010 - 18:05:13 PST