RE: [late-review] Re: libar Makefile.am,1.9,1.10 ar.3,1.1,1.2 ar.c,1.7,1.8 ar.h,1.2,1.3

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_cloudmark.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:46:50 -0700

> -----Original Message-----
> From: opendkim-dev-bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org [mailto:opendkim-dev-
> bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org] On Behalf Of Mike Markley
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 1:45 AM
> To: opendkim-dev_at_lists.opendkim.org
> Subject: Re: [late-review] Re: libar Makefile.am,1.9,1.10 ar.3,1.1,1.2
> ar.c,1.7,1.8 ar.h,1.2,1.3
>
> > The internals of the library did change in that the upgrade to TCP is now
> > done internally and automatically rather than having to be explicitly
> > requested by the caller. It's true the parameter list didn't change, but
> > I felt this was substantive enough to warrant a change to the library
> > version.
>
> Does an attempt to request the TCP upgrade result in something failing,
> or is it silently ignored?

Previously you would re-instantiate the library in TCP mode and then re-send your query through the new handle. Now the same handle will upgrade itself when truncation occurs. The caller doesn't need to take any action.
Received on Wed Sep 01 2010 - 16:46:59 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 29 2012 - 23:32:54 PST