Re: [late-review] Re: libar Makefile.am,1.9,1.10 ar.3,1.1,1.2 ar.c,1.7,1.8 ar.h,1.2,1.3

From: Mike Markley <mike_at_markley.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 01:45:11 -0700

On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 07:01:55AM -0700, Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_blackops.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, Daniel Black wrote:
> >An ABI bump consists of IMO quoted from elsewhere. "Let???s just say
> >that when you make an ABI bump you either remove functions, or you
> >change the meaning of some functions (like the parameters, the behaviour
> >or other things like those)."
>
> The internals of the library did change in that the upgrade to TCP is now
> done internally and automatically rather than having to be explicitly
> requested by the caller. It's true the parameter list didn't change, but
> I felt this was substantive enough to warrant a change to the library
> version.

Does an attempt to request the TCP upgrade result in something failing,
or is it silently ignored?

-- 
Mike Markley <mike_at_markley.org>
Chemist who falls in acid will be tripping for weeks.
Received on Wed Sep 01 2010 - 08:45:23 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 29 2012 - 23:32:54 PST