RE: difference between opendkim-testmsg and opendkim for verification
>Try manually adding CRs to the wrapped header fields (I saw several) and
>see if you still get asymmetric behaviour.
Ok that fixed it. Thank you very much. Adding CRs on the wrapped headers passes the message using opendkim-testmsg. But I still don't understand how it works with the opendkim binary. Is there any way I can use the libopendkim to work the same way as opendkim? Is the message parsed differently in opendkim vs opendkim-testmsg. I see that dkim_eom is called in opendkim-testmsg, but opendkim does its own parsing I guess?
Received on Tue Jan 29 2013 - 20:11:16 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Jan 29 2013 - 20:18:02 PST