RE: difference between opendkim-testmsg and opendkim for verification

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_blackops.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 11:55:03 -0800 (PST)

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> The input message you sent has had its CRs stripped from any header field
> that's continued. It looks like something in your handling path is not doing
> field wrapping properly.

Try manually adding CRs to the wrapped header fields (I saw several) and
see if you still get asymmetric behaviour.
Received on Tue Jan 29 2013 - 19:55:18 PST