On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>> 1024 bit is an insecure key?
>>
>> That's a DNSSEC "insecure", not a key-too-small "insecure".
>
> Oh. Thanks. I didn't realize that.
Now taking suggestions for better wording. :-)
Received on Thu Dec 13 2012 - 20:25:40 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Thu Dec 13 2012 - 20:27:02 PST