Re: adsp fail

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Scott Kitterman <ietf-dkim_at_kitterman.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:04 -0500

On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 02:37:17 PM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > 1024 bit is an insecure key?
>
> That's a DNSSEC "insecure", not a key-too-small "insecure".

Oh. Thanks. I didn't realize that.

Scott K
Received on Wed Dec 12 2012 - 23:04:13 PST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dan Mahoney, System Admin: "Listing the "testing" flag in Authentication-Results?"
Previous message: Benny Pedersen: "Re: adsp fail"
In reply to: Murray S. Kucherawy: "Re: adsp fail"
Next in thread: Murray S. Kucherawy: "Re: adsp fail"
Reply: Murray S. Kucherawy: "Re: adsp fail"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Dec 12 2012 - 23:09:02 PST