On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_blackops.org> wrote:
> Could someone with postfix expertise have a look at this?
>
> I've asked the original poster to subscribe here and discuss the problem. I
> think it's clear from the start that if we had a problem with From: first,
> we'd have known about it by now, not to mention the fact that the entire
> opendkim test suite uses From: first and things get signed.
>
> My inclination is to think hammering postfix with data via "nc", or the lack
> of a separating line before the body, is the likely culprit.
In case you didn't see it in SourceForge, the guy figured out that he
had some kind of Received header purging going on that was too
aggressive. You were correct that "we would have known it by now."
:-)
...Todd
--
The total budget at all receivers for solving senders' problems is $0.
If you want them to accept your mail and manage it the way you want,
send it the way the spec says to. --John Levine
Received on Wed Nov 28 2012 - 13:46:38 PST