On 20/Mar/12 22:41, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> From: lists.opendkim.org On Behalf Of Rolf E. Sonneveld
>> May I suggest to move this discussion to the ietf-dkim mailing list, as
>> the original question is not OpenDKIM specific and this mailing list is
>> intended to be used to discuss OpenDKIM implementation questions,
>> issues etc.
>
> I suggest bringing it up on ietf-dkim. If there's consensus on
> what "discardable" should mean, then you could file an erratum
> against it, which will get tracked and then picked up whenever
> someone does an RFC5617bis.
It has been done already, see
http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2008q1/009557.html
Received on Wed Mar 21 2012 - 08:51:18 PST