RE: DKIM DNS policy records

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_cloudmark.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 21:41:57 +0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: opendkim-users-bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org [mailto:opendkim-users-bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org] On Behalf Of Rolf E. Sonneveld
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 2:13 PM
> To: Alessandro Vesely
> Cc: opendkim-users_at_lists.opendkim.org
> Subject: Re: DKIM DNS policy records
>
> The authoritative source of information about ADSP is RFC5617. If
> RFC5617 is not clear about what 'discardable' means, it should be
> addressed in an update to that RFC. A Wikipedia article that explains
> ADSP is nice, but it can not replace (part of) RFC5617.
>
> May I suggest to move this discussion to the ietf-dkim mailing list, as
> the original question is not OpenDKIM specific and this mailing list is
> intended to be used to discuss OpenDKIM implementation questions,
> issues etc.

I suggest bringing it up on ietf-dkim. If there's consensus on what "discardable" should mean, then you could file an erratum against it, which will get tracked and then picked up whenever someone does an RFC5617bis.

-MSK
Received on Tue Mar 20 2012 - 21:42:04 PST