On 12/17/2011 01:54 PM, SM wrote:
> Hi Ram,
> At 23:19 16-12-2011, Ram wrote:
>> That *is* a simple sample code :-)
>
> According to the Overview document for libopendkim, there are nine
> steps for DKIM signing. If it was that simple, the sample code would
> be simple. :-) If you do not feed in the message headers and body as
> they will appear at the verifier's end, you will end up with invalid
> DKIM signatures.
>
> You might come back to this mailing list and point out that
> libopendkim is "not working". We will then discuss about whether it
> is a bug in:
>
> (i) libopendkim;
> (ii) your milter;
> (iii) the milter library;
> (iv) or due to chaos theory
>
> To preempt all that, I suggested reading code that works to understand
> the considerations OpenDKIM took into account when doing DKIM signing.
>
Thanks
I never really *had* to use opendkim. I just need a signing library.
I found this on code.google .. seems to suit my purpose.
http://code.google.com/p/firm-dkim/
Anyway sorry for being OT
--
Ram
> Regards,
> -sm
>
>
Received on Sat Dec 17 2011 - 08:38:11 PST