RE: Log not verbose enough

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_cloudmark.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:19:18 -0800

> -----Original Message-----
> From: opendkim-users-bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org [mailto:opendkim-users-bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org] On Behalf Of Todd Lyons
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 8:34 AM
> To: miha.vrhovnik_at_cordia.si
> Cc: opendkim-users_at_lists.opendkim.org
> Subject: Re: Log not verbose enough
>
> Are you implying that your sendmail is not logging which headers it is
> inserting into the emails? Hmmm, I assumed sendmail, but if you're
> using postfix, I don't know what the logging differences are. In that
> case, I can see that more detailed logging, at least of the From
> header being used (as a part of the LogWhy output) and selector used
> might be useful.

You hit the nail on the head: SyslogSuccess was added specifically because postfix doesn't log the content of the added signature.

It should be easy enough to include the requested information in that log line.
Received on Wed Jan 12 2011 - 19:19:27 PST