Re: Delayed email because of signing

From: Jason Clint <jtclint_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:20:37 -0700

Sorry I take part of that back, the overall send was actually faster. Even
the dkim signing, possibly like Todd said it was related to dns, which would
explain why the windows machine with the app did not work as well as the
linux sendmail box without dkim which just relayed.

On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Jason Clint <jtclint_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> The setup before was someone using a client sender on a windows machine to
> send out bulk sends to my linux sendmail box with dkim on it. I switched it
> to go from the app on the windows machine to a linux sendmail server which
> relayed to the server with dkim on it. The dkim verified just fine and it
> went through rather quickly from his side. It still took time to add the
> dkim signature but at that point his app wasn't waiting for a response so it
> could proceed onto the next message.
>
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Alessandro Vesely <vesely_at_tana.it> wrote:
>
>> On 08/Dec/10 00:17, Jason Clint wrote:
>> > Ok sorry to take so long to get back, was testing some things. It
>> > would seem that the tool that my guy was using to send his emails from
>> > would wait for a response from the server before moving on to the next
>> > email for verification on if it was successfully sent or not.
>>
>> May I ask which server are you talking about? It is not clear whether
>> that is your local server or the remote MX. In the latter case you'd
>> also have to add DKIM verification time...
>>
>> JM2C
>>
>>
>
Received on Wed Dec 08 2010 - 22:20:51 PST