Re: Delayed email because of signing

From: Jason Clint <jtclint_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:14:48 -0700

sorry only sent this response to murray but meant to send it to everyone:
there is a strip from the logs for one email as well, from the second setup
which takes 5 seconds for 1 email.

On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Jason Clint <jtclint_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Dec 8 16:08:26 mail8 sendmail[4440]: oB8N8QhI004440: from=<
> myuser_at_mydomain.com>, size=216, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<
> 201012082308.oB8N8QhI004440_at_mail8.mydomain.com>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA,
> relay=mycomputer.myotherdomain.com [10.0.88.97]
> Dec 8 16:08:26 mail8 sendmail[4440]: oB8N8QhI004440: Milter insert (1):
> header: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=
> mydomain.com;\n\ts=mail8;
> t=1291849706;\n\tbh=QSgPvOwUjJTwPVjpDpfasfDfFSVT7pP97txaRIs5rX4=;\n\th=From:Subject:To:Date;\n\tb=Rxapyu/o1RKzV/mLNfLaA6HdfjPpet03EdeFlehEsm2V/IXX5TfXE2rzlLLqaIFyq\n\t
> 6nunQHuiibzdV3R3CEmw2Wz2cjdCXC/3+UMrlxMUrpeOV0Nx5PxTdQ8dxNZSLiD0Fs\n\t
> 2OP2PvSRWD1ugP9jX6aa/0VISH2zAGU8Tdb0U+xA=
> Dec 8 16:08:27 mail8 sendmail[4443]: oB8N8QhI004440: to=<
> jclint_at_myotherdomain.com>, delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp,
> pri=120216, relay=exchange.myotherdomain.com. [10.0.1.21], dsn=2.0.0,
> stat=Sent ( <201012082308.oB8N8QhI004440_at_mail8.mydomain.com> Queued mail
> for delivery)
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_cloudmark.com>wrote:
>
>> This is why I would like to see logs from the “second setup” server
>> showing a single message taking a long time to go through. To do this, pick
>> a queue ID from the log for a message that took a while, “grep” for it in
>> the log, and just paste the output of your “grep” here. Then we can see if
>> opendkim is causing the delay or something else.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* opendkim-users-bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org [mailto:
>> opendkim-users-bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org] *On Behalf Of *Jason Clint
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 08, 2010 2:55 PM
>> *To:* Murray S. Kucherawy
>> *Cc:* Alessandro Vesely; opendkim-users_at_lists.opendkim.org
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: Delayed email because of signing
>>
>>
>>
>> Well if it wasn't DNS then the only other thing I can think of would be
>> that the flux of emails going into the sender directly compared the current
>> setup which is being relayed caused it to slow down. Otherwise what else
>> would it be, I mean looking at the 3 setups
>>
>>
>> First setup: No DKIM no Relay 1-2 emails a second
>> Second Setup: DKIM no Relay 1 email every 5 seconds
>> Current Setup: DKIM with Relay 1-2 emails a second
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_blackops.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Jason Clint wrote:
>>
>> Sorry I take part of that back, the overall send was actually faster.
>> Even the dkim signing, possibly like Todd said it was related to dns, which
>> would explain why the windows machine with the app did not work as well as
>> the linux sendmail box without dkim which just relayed.
>>
>>
>>
>> DKIM signing is unrelated to DNS. Only verifying involves DNS queries.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Wed Dec 08 2010 - 23:15:03 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thu Dec 09 2010 - 02:50:00 PST