Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> Hmm. We might be using *_CFLAGS in some places where we should be
>> using *_CPPFLAGS. Seems to me the preprocessor pass might receive the
>> latter but not the former.
>
> Yep, that fixed it. I'll send you a new configure script to try shortly, when I have a new OpenSSL installed and have tested it there.
>
Thanks !!! 8-)
The patch solved the library issue.
I'll try to run it tomorrow.
Just a hint to when you'll work on the signed char warnings...
configure shows some warnings and there is this at config.log file :
configure:12625: checking for limits.h
configure:12634: result: yes
configure:12514: checking iso/limits_iso.h usability
configure:12531: cc -xc99=all -c -g conftest.c >&5
configure:12538: $? = 0
configure:12552: result: yes
configure:12556: checking iso/limits_iso.h presence
configure:12571: cc -xc99=all -E conftest.c
"/usr/include/iso/limits_iso.h", line 51: #error: "chars are signed or
unsigned"
cc: acomp failed for conftest.c
Around line 51 of limits_iso.h file, there is this :
#if defined(_CHAR_IS_SIGNED)
#define CHAR_MIN SCHAR_MIN /* min value of a "char" */
#define CHAR_MAX SCHAR_MAX /* max value of a "char" */
#elif defined(_CHAR_IS_UNSIGNED)
#define CHAR_MIN 0 /* min value of a "char" */
#define CHAR_MAX UCHAR_MAX /* max value of a "char" */
#else
#error "chars are signed or unsigned"
#endif
I haven't looked anything more, but this may be a hint. Either way, this
signed vs unsigned issues appeared also with gcc-4... and Sun C compiler
is much more rigourous than gcc. PITA... ;-(
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Jose Marcio MARTINS DA CRUZ http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr
Ecole des Mines de Paris
60, bd Saint Michel 75272 - PARIS CEDEX 06
mailto:Jose-Marcio.Martins_at_mines-paristech.fr
Received on Tue Nov 24 2009 - 20:49:57 PST