RE: OpenDKIM v1.2.0-Beta0 available

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_cloudmark.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:30:40 -0800

> -----Original Message-----
> From: opendkim-users-bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org [mailto:opendkim-users-
> bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org] On Behalf Of Murray S. Kucherawy
> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 12:14 PM
> To: Jose-Marcio.Martins_at_mines-paristech.fr
> Cc: opendkim-users_at_lists.opendkim.org
> Subject: RE: OpenDKIM v1.2.0-Beta0 available
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz [mailto:Jose-Marcio.Martins_at_mines-
> > paristech.fr]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 12:10 PM
> > To: Murray S. Kucherawy
> > Cc: opendkim-users_at_lists.opendkim.org
> > Subject: Re: OpenDKIM v1.2.0-Beta0 available
> >
> > I don't use /usr/sfw as the solaris openssl installation is very old
> > and doesn't include sha256. It's same on sparc and x86.
> >
> > > Where are your SSL includes if not at /usr/local/ssl/include?
> > ./configure appeared to find them for the tests above.
> >
> > Just at /usr/local/ssl. But look at config.log :
> >
> > >> configure:14600: checking openssl/ssl.h usability
> > >> configure:14617: cc -xc99=all -c -I/usr/local/ssl/include -g
> >
> > ..
> >
> > >> configure:14642: checking openssl/ssl.h presence
> > >> configure:14657: cc -xc99=all -E conftest.c
> >
> > It runs the compiler twice. The first one it has the option "-I...",
> > but
> > not the second one. This is the problem.
>
> Hmm. We might be using *_CFLAGS in some places where we should be
> using *_CPPFLAGS. Seems to me the preprocessor pass might receive the
> latter but not the former.

Yep, that fixed it. I'll send you a new configure script to try shortly, when I have a new OpenSSL installed and have tested it there.
Received on Tue Nov 24 2009 - 20:30:49 PST