Re: [opendkim-users] Issue with Simple canonicalization

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_blackops.org>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 11:04:44 -0700 (PDT)

On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Ted Nichols wrote:
> I am testing a DKIM signing routine and have run into an issue with
> OpenDKIM's verification when the canonicalization is set to simple. If
> Canonicalization is set to relaxed, everything passes, but if I set it
> to simple for either header or body I get a verification failure. I am
> testing against the sendmail DKIM-milter and several other 3rd party
> implementations of DKIM, and all the other implementations pass these
> same messages. Has anyone else seen anything similar?

SM's request would be the same as mine; a copy of the original message and
of the two canonicalized forms, which are stored in /var/tmp when you have
"KeepTemporaryFiles" turned on, would be useful in figuring out what's
going on.

-MSK
Received on Sat Sep 05 2009 - 18:04:58 PST