Re: Building with DB on CentOS/RHEL

From: Steve Jenkins <stevejenkins_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 22:07:11 -0700

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Scott Kitterman <ietf-dkim_at_kitterman.com>wrote:

> On Thursday, May 16, 2013 09:43:18 PM Steve Jenkins wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy
> <msk_at_blackops.org>wrote:
> > > On Thu, 16 May 2013, Steve Jenkins wrote:
> > >> # grep memcached_return_t /usr/include/libmemcached/*
> > >>
> > >> There's a memcached_constants.h, but memcached_return_t is nowhere to
> be
> > >
> > >> found in it:
> > > Ah, then probably we have a libmemcached versioning problem. The build
> > > I've been using is 0.48 but it looks like the one you're using is a
> fair
> > > bit older. Perhaps I need to version-limit the check in configure.ac.
> > > I'll propose a patch later today.
> >
> > The default (EPEL) repos have libmemcached-0.31-1.1 as the version
> > available for both EL5 and EL6, so that's what it would have to
> > successfully build with.
>
> I just spent some time trolling back through the VCS history. 0.36
> (released
> January 2010) is the first version to have memcached_return_t. Before
> that it
> was called memcached_return. Other than the name change, the typedef is
> unchanged, so I wonder if changing memcached_return_t to memcached_return
> would be enough to get it to build with the older version. The commit
> message
> for the commit that changed it is "Style cleanup".
>
> In any case, I think 0.36 ought to be the minimum supported version in the
> configure check


Thx, Scott. So does that mean I could potentially apply a patch on the EL
package build, and it could still build with memcached support? Or does
OpenDKIM actually require 0.36 in order to work properly?

SteveJ
Received on Fri May 17 2013 - 05:07:25 PST