On 07/15/2012 06:38 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Ken Murchison wrote:
>>> After looking at this again, I'm wondering if DKIM_OPTS_MUSTBESIGNED
>>> should be used for this purpose rather than a new list and option.
>>> It seems appropriately named.
>>>
>>> Is this something that could be added to the existing code base or is a
>>> full-fledged libdoseta the preferred avenue?
>>
>> Any thoughts on this?
>>
>> I'd love to see this, or some variation on it included in a future
>> release, unless libdoseta is forthcoming.
>
> Ken,
>
> It's a candidate for 2.7.0. Please open a SourceForge tracker under
> "Patches" and attach your patch there.
>
> The main change I'll make to it is to wrap it in conditional compilation
> since it actually enables generation of non-compliant DKIM signatures.
> I think we should make that as tinker-proof as possble.
>
> I also don't think we should make it available through the filter at
> all, or at least I can't think of a reason to expose it that way.
I don't know how I let this slip through the cracks, but I finally
submitted my iSchedule patch. Hopefully its not too late to get it into
2.7.0
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1147703&aid=3562496&group_id=269812
--
Kenneth Murchison
Principal Systems Software Engineer
Carnegie Mellon University
Received on Tue Aug 28 2012 - 17:58:19 PST