Re: Discontinuing DomainKeys support

From: Gary Mills <>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 08:10:07 -0600

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:13:30AM -0800, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> The DK library for which we maintain hooks is buggy and won't be fixed
> anytime soon, but we get to deal with its problems

The memory leaks does seem easy to fix, but I'm sure that other bugs
will appear later.

> It complicates the code that generates Authentication-Results fields

Is domain keys the only other second signing that's verified? If so,
that's a good reason.

> First: Do people concur?

Yes. I can do with out domain keys verification now.

> Second: If so, what sort of time window is appropriate here? 2.4.0
> (whenever it occurs, probably this summer), the first major release
> after October 1, the first major release after 2011, or something
> else?

2.4.0 is fine with me.

-Gary Mills-        -Unix Group-        -Computer and Network Services-
Received on Sat Mar 12 2011 - 14:10:15 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 29 2012 - 23:33:09 PST