Re: opendkim(8) manual patch

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_blackops.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:03:27 -0700 (PDT)

On Tue, 13 Jul 2010, Mike Markley wrote:
> Fair enough. I have a use case for it, but it's pretty specific to
> package maintainers: using command-line instead of config file means an
> init script can rely on the value for startup and shutdown.
>
> That's also the only use case I can think of for it, though. I can crack
> that nut with a local patch to create a default, or by checking the
> config file for an argument (but that requires the config file to
> contain it, which it may not already). Since opendkim has yet to release
> in Debian stable, it's not such a big deal for me, but I can't say the
> same for Ubuntu, which has released with 2.0.2...

Yeah, that's a good argument for restoring it, and I've encountered this
in a work-related project as well. We can put it back for 2.1.3.
Received on Wed Jul 14 2010 - 05:03:44 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 29 2012 - 23:32:53 PST