RE: dkim_set_dns_callback Re: async resolver

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_cloudmark.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:05:27 -0700

> -----Original Message-----
> From: opendkim-dev-bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org [mailto:opendkim-dev-
> bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Black
> Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 3:40 AM
> To: opendkim-dev_at_lists.opendkim.org
> Subject: dkim_set_dns_callback Re: async resolver
>
> On Tuesday 20 October 2009 14:31:33 Daniel Black wrote:
>
> My bad. libopendkim is fine. Bit odd that it returns DKIM_STAT_INVALID
> rather
> than DKIM_STAT_NOTIMPLEMENT.
>
> > > libopendkim implements the callback mechanism. The function
> > > dkim_set_dns_callback()
> .....(cut untested ramble)...
>
> > For opendkim - the callback could be set and just ignore the result
> of
> > dkim_set_dns_callback as we can't do anything with it anyway.
>
> it was quicker for me to write the patch than complain about it.
> http://gitorious.org/opendkim/opendkim/commit/b28bf3b5281cd21153caae06a
> c8046e162f000ab

If I'm reading that page correctly, your patch basically removes libar altogether from the build (i.e. there's no way to select libar vs. the stock resolver any longer). Is that what you intended?
Received on Tue Oct 20 2009 - 18:05:37 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 29 2012 - 23:32:29 PST