RE: v1.1.0 release pending

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_cloudmark.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 11:35:47 -0700

> -----Original Message-----
> From: opendkim-dev-bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org [mailto:opendkim-dev-
> bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org] On Behalf Of Mike Markley
> Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 11:20 AM
> To: opendkim-dev_at_lists.opendkim.org
> Subject: Re: v1.1.0 release pending
>
> [...]
> That's my thought, as well. It probably makes the most sense since
> arlib
> uses res_mkquery() directly, but the rest of the source relies only on
> dn_*(), so there are two distinct uses, should they be spread across
> different libraries.

OK, great. On my system if I add a check for dn_comp() to configure.ac, it has no effect since res_mkquery() and dn_comp() are both in libc. Does adding that check work on Debian, which I presume would find them both in -lresolv?
Received on Wed Sep 09 2009 - 18:36:06 PST