Re: possible bug in Mail::DKIM when keysize is under 1024 bits
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
Maybe in reply to
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Benny Pedersen <
me_at_junc.eu
>
Date
: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 18:45:37 +0100
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2015-01-11 18:16:
> A quick Google search brings up this
>
https://wordtothewise.com/2012/11/how-long-is-your-dkim-key/
>
> It's a recommendation not a requirement so the pass even when lower
> than 1024 is accurate.
bug created,
https://sourceforge.net/p/opendkim/bugs/215/
but i still think Mail::DKIM is at fault
can spamassassin change to warn on small keysize ?
Received on
Sun Jan 11 2015 - 17:45:54 PST
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Kevin A. McGrail: "Re: possible bug in Mail::DKIM when keysize is under 1024 bits"
Previous message
:
Christian Rößner: "Re: Crashes with Grsecurity kernel"
Maybe in reply to
:
A. Schulze: "Re: possible bug in Mail::DKIM when keysize is under 1024 bits"
Next in thread
:
Kevin A. McGrail: "Re: possible bug in Mail::DKIM when keysize is under 1024 bits"
Reply
:
Kevin A. McGrail: "Re: possible bug in Mail::DKIM when keysize is under 1024 bits"
Reply
:
Scott Kitterman: "Re: possible bug in Mail::DKIM when keysize is under 1024 bits"
Reply
:
SM: "Re: possible bug in Mail::DKIM when keysize is under 1024 bits"
Reply
:
Murray S. Kucherawy: "Re: possible bug in Mail::DKIM when keysize is under 1024 bits"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.3.0
: Sun Jan 11 2015 - 17:54:00 PST