Re: adsp fail

From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely_at_tana.it>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:02:44 +0100

On Wed 12/Dec/2012 22:53:16 +0100 Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> Authentication-Results: mx.elandsys.com; dkim=pass
> reason="1024-bit key; insecure key" header.i=_at_junc.org
> header.b=QNF1SlEA; dkim-adsp=pass
>
> so its solved :=)

For the message I'm replying to, I have:

  Authentication-Results: wmail.tana.it;
    dkim=fail (signature verification failed) header.i=_at_junc.org;
    dkim-adsp=fail header.from=me_at_junc.org

The A-R by mx.elandsys.com gives a pass, similar to the one quoted
above. My dkim=fail implies opendkim.org's signature failed as well.

Curiously, all of Benny's messages had such behavior. One thing I can
see is that the messages I received have:

  To: opendkim-users_at_lists.opendkim.org

while Benny's signature z= says:

  |To:=20<opendkim-users_at_lists.opendkim.org>|
Received on Thu Dec 13 2012 - 13:02:57 PST