On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> Unfortunately, this solution is not acceptable either. This is because
> if it is set up this way, messages get signed *after* Amavis verifies
> them.
Why is that bad?
> Thus, the only solution is to dump OpenDKIM and use Amavis for signing,
> or for OpenDKIM to implement an agent like Amavis does so it does not
> have to be used as a milter.
Short of someone contributing his or her own time and energy to do make
this change, it's not going to happen in the short term. It's a very
large change and will take time to plan and test before it can be
released.
Sorry to see you go...
-MSK
Received on Tue Oct 23 2012 - 04:42:51 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Mon Oct 29 2012 - 23:20:44 PST