On 03/31/2012 11:51 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Saturday, March 31, 2012 09:47:55 AM John Merriam wrote:
>> But, why in the heck would having LocalADSP enabled cause this to
>> happen, especially on a message with no signature?!
>
> ADSP operates on messages without a valid signature (the protocol in rough
> terms is:
>
> If not DKIM signed, check for ADSP based on 5322.From.
> If ADSP record found, do what it says.
>
> So LocalADSP would only ever be relevant in terms of the unsigned message.
That makes sense. I guess I wasn't thinking about it too much when I
wrote that sentence.
Still shouldn't croak obviously. I would guess there is some sort of
problem with parsing malformed From headers when LocalADSP is enabled in
OpenDKIM.
--
John Merriam
Received on Sat Mar 31 2012 - 18:24:08 PST