Hi Murray,
At 20:11 17-12-2011, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>The unfortunate thing is that this isn't a clear claim in either
>direction. RFC6376 is trying to make two points:
Yes.
>So I guess it comes down to what you mean by "protected". The
>signature won't validate if the message was altered after it left
>the signer, so you know that a valid signature means it's unchanged
>since the signer last handled it. That's really all it tells you.
I guess that the easy answer would be that DKIM does not offer the
type of protection that PGP or S/MIME offers.
Regards,
-sm
Received on Sun Dec 18 2011 - 07:06:43 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sun Dec 18 2011 - 14:50:03 PST