Re: multithreaded environment ? (better now: multi-core environment)

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: SM <sm_at_resistor.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 14:02:47 -0800

At 07:18 01-12-2011, Frank Gadegast wrote:
>Its only using 1/16 of the possible performance on our system.

See http://lists.opendkim.org/archive/opendkim/dev/2011/01/0790.html

Regards,
-sm
Received on Thu Dec 01 2011 - 22:16:47 PST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dipl-Inform. Frank Gadegast: "Re: multithreaded environment ? (better now: multi-core environment)"
Previous message: Claus Assmann: "Re: multithreaded environment ? (better now: multi-core environment)"
In reply to: Frank Gadegast: "Re: multithreaded environment ? (better now: multi-core environment)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Fri Dec 02 2011 - 02:50:02 PST