RE: key retreival error, reply truncated, any ideas?

From: Howard Leadmon <howard_at_leadmon.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 14:43:51 -0400

   Thanks for the reply, and I hate to play stupid here, but what does that
tell me? Is there something I can correct on our end to accept the mail if
the sigs are valid, or is this a problem on the remote end?

 I know DNS is usually UDP, but also know TCP should work as a fallback.
Just trying to see if this is correctable, or not, as without putting in a
specific exception for logmein.com, that mail would never be accepted..

---
Howard Leadmon 
-----Original Message-----
From: opendkim-users-bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org
[mailto:opendkim-users-bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org] On Behalf Of SM
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 2:32 PM
To: Howard Leadmon
Cc: opendkim-users_at_lists.opendkim.org
Subject: Re: key retreival error, reply truncated, any ideas?
Hi Howard,
At 11:13 07-10-2011, Howard Leadmon wrote:
>     I know in general we have DKIM working well, but I have this 
> implemented on a client's server that is getting an error, and I am
> not quite sure what to make of it.    I was able to get the email 
> in for them by placing an exemption in the config, but that really 
> just masks the problem.   So I am trying to figure out if this is 
> something wrong at logmein.com, or is this a problem on my side of the 
> shop that I need to address.
>
>Here is the error:
>
>Oct  7 13:50:30 mail2 mail2-smtp[48120]: p97HoRe1048120: 
>from=<do-not-reply_at_logmein.com>, size=11127, class=0, nrcpts=1, 
>msgid=<smail.1318007021211.xq4zkgpblvfirvthyq6l4110khgspvrc0mqe7k3we58m
>9npd2l_at_WWW01-13.logmein.com>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA-v4, 
>relay=relay01-01.logmein.com [69.25.20.1]
>
>Oct  7 13:50:30 mail2 dkim-filter[1488]: p97HoRe1048120: key retrieval 
>failed (s=s1024, d=logmein.com):
>`s1024._domainkey.logmein.com' reply truncated
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;s1024._domainkey.logmein.com.  IN      TXT
;; ANSWER SECTION:
s1024._domainkey.logmein.com. 3600 IN   TXT     "t=y\; k=rsa\; 
p=MIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEA0hy41d0xkZMaR0FrbAkHgu7JBHwg49
fiIs1rY" 
"AIUAEvPtgnDGzpcz7p9DwammDBV0UL40PtBNpc+BgNdcceLUqa0/QdfwHwWs7WyK5b3ElCddtee
FiLu76QqBEavqZ2qvF2cT" 
"fcUreMjlLDmSROLy0wWJ//lGRUS6uGAxAgXIKn5+y5HkJbsfkvKGmbvcZSRwfM/j3cwQ6kbMTlp
PYrdfj59Na+1NysJITGqp" 
"so62jp78IfXrM0U0YfzoDX88E6g8H3ypPswcA9YJ4ZlFRjgxmBnYS+tCbQ2TF23ddloC/6yQ6ah
s5ngHpPMm35sgR2PYiaCD" 
"zuv3teeFS+QIKtVVwIDAQAB"
The query was retried over TCP as the answer is 531 bytes.
Regards,
-sm 

Received on Fri Oct 07 2011 - 18:44:04 PST