RE: Using results of dkim for gmail

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_cloudmark.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:18:24 -0700

> -----Original Message-----
> From: opendkim-users-bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org [mailto:opendkim-users-bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org] On Behalf Of Steve Fatula
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 3:05 PM
> To: SM
> Cc: Opendkim
> Subject: Re: Using results of dkim for gmail
>
> I guess I did not explain properly, yes, gmail signs all mail no matter
> how it is sent, client relaying, direct from web interface, however.
> And, gmail (google) already as of 2008 rejects ALL paypal and ebay
> emails that do not pass dkim checks.
>
> I, however, did not say they had to pass the checks. My statement was
> merely unsigned. If a message comes from ebay, and it is not dkim
> signed, then, it's a forgery. That's the logic I want to use.

If you want to be specific about "not signed" being different from "signature present but failed", despite the fact that the DKIM specs warn you not to do that, you can use the Lua script hooks to add that logic to the filter for you.
Received on Wed Aug 10 2011 - 22:18:32 PST