FYI - I'm using Postscreen, which I've set up to check three RBLs
prior to handing over to Postfix's SMTP process.
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_cloudmark.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: tlyons_at_sitehelp.org [mailto:tlyons_at_sitehelp.org] On Behalf Of Todd Lyons
>> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 9:18 AM
>> To: Murray S. Kucherawy
>> Cc: opendkim-users_at_lists.opendkim.org
>> Subject: Re: Question for our stats reporting sites
>>
>> Mine is doing several RBL checks before the spam scanning occurs. Do
>> you need more detail about which ones?
>
> Nope. I think your setup is typical. It just means that whatever claims we might make based on the accumulated stats, we have to include the description of the typical system making the report, i.e., that the data are tainted versus an unfiltered stream by things like RBLs and possibly procmail, spamassassin, etc.
>
>
>
Received on Thu Jun 02 2011 - 15:29:27 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thu Jun 02 2011 - 20:50:03 PST