On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Nigel Horne wrote:
> Could I suggest that
> http://www.opendkim.org/libopendkim/dkim_libversion.html would be more
> useful if it documented the format of the return result, that is to say
> that it were to mention that the best way to use the number is to
> interpret it as a hexadecimal number.
I've changed its type to uint32_t, and added this text to the
documentation:
+The version is encoded as a four-octet integer, with the octets
+representing (from highest-order to lowest-order) the release number,
+the major version number, the minor version number, and the patch level.
The next scheduled release is set for early June, and will be 2.4.0. If
any major bug reports come in or a sufficient mass of minor ones, there
could be a 2.3.3 in the interim.
-MSK
Received on Thu Apr 14 2011 - 19:41:04 PST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sun May 15 2011 - 15:58:22 PST