Re: Delayed email because of signing

From: Jason Clint <jtclint_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:10:41 -0700

Dec 8 16:08:26 mail8 sendmail[4440]: oB8N8QhI004440: from=<
myuser_at_mydomain.com>, size=216, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<
201012082308.oB8N8QhI004440_at_mail8.mydomain.com>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA,
relay=mycomputer.myotherdomain.com [10.0.88.97]
Dec 8 16:08:26 mail8 sendmail[4440]: oB8N8QhI004440: Milter insert (1):
header: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;
d=mydomain.com;\n\ts=mail8;
t=1291849706;\n\tbh=QSgPvOwUjJTwPVjpDpfasfDfFSVT7pP97txaRIs5rX4=;\n\th=From:Subject:To:Date;\n\tb=Rxapyu/o1RKzV/mLNfLaA6HdfjPpet03EdeFlehEsm2V/IXX5TfXE2rzlLLqaIFyq\n\t
6nunQHuiibzdV3R3CEmw2Wz2cjdCXC/3+UMrlxMUrpeOV0Nx5PxTdQ8dxNZSLiD0Fs\n\t
2OP2PvSRWD1ugP9jX6aa/0VISH2zAGU8Tdb0U+xA=
Dec 8 16:08:27 mail8 sendmail[4443]: oB8N8QhI004440: to=<
jclint_at_myotherdomain.com>, delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=esmtp,
pri=120216, relay=exchange.myotherdomain.com. [10.0.1.21], dsn=2.0.0,
stat=Sent ( <201012082308.oB8N8QhI004440_at_mail8.mydomain.com> Queued mail for
delivery)


On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_cloudmark.com>wrote:

> This is why I would like to see logs from the “second setup” server
> showing a single message taking a long time to go through. To do this, pick
> a queue ID from the log for a message that took a while, “grep” for it in
> the log, and just paste the output of your “grep” here. Then we can see if
> opendkim is causing the delay or something else.
>
>
>
> *From:* opendkim-users-bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org [mailto:
> opendkim-users-bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org] *On Behalf Of *Jason Clint
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 08, 2010 2:55 PM
> *To:* Murray S. Kucherawy
> *Cc:* Alessandro Vesely; opendkim-users_at_lists.opendkim.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: Delayed email because of signing
>
>
>
> Well if it wasn't DNS then the only other thing I can think of would be
> that the flux of emails going into the sender directly compared the current
> setup which is being relayed caused it to slow down. Otherwise what else
> would it be, I mean looking at the 3 setups
>
>
> First setup: No DKIM no Relay 1-2 emails a second
> Second Setup: DKIM no Relay 1 email every 5 seconds
> Current Setup: DKIM with Relay 1-2 emails a second
>
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_blackops.org>
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Jason Clint wrote:
>
> Sorry I take part of that back, the overall send was actually faster. Even
> the dkim signing, possibly like Todd said it was related to dns, which would
> explain why the windows machine with the app did not work as well as the
> linux sendmail box without dkim which just relayed.
>
>
>
> DKIM signing is unrelated to DNS. Only verifying involves DNS queries.
>
>
>
Received on Wed Dec 08 2010 - 23:10:56 PST