RE: Signing problem

From: Jason Clint <nosaj_17_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:42:44 +0000

Looks like the same issue, if that test site is correct. I only actually see the from address set as root_at_domain.com though is that why you are saying its failing?

From: nosaj_17_at_hotmail.com
To: steve_at_stevejenkins.com
CC: opendkim-users_at_lists.opendkim.org
Subject: RE: Signing problem
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:39:34 +0000








Got this from that test:

DKIM Information:DKIM Signature
Message contains this DKIM Signature:
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;
        d=mail.marlborosurvey.net; s=mail; t=1288132621;
        bh=frcCV1k9oG9oKj3dpUqdJg1PxRT2RSN/XKdLCPjaYaY=;
        h=Date:From:Message-Id:To;
        z=Date:=20Tue,=2026=20Oct=202010=2016:37:01=20-0600|From:=20root=20
         |Message-Id:=20<201010262237.o9QMb1x
         d008348_at_mail.marlborosurvey.net>|To:=20pYYPEv3cs7_at_www.brandoncheck
         etts.com;
        b=ne4uSkDYbE9cwS65BJsfiYwuO8l72lDmfMq+YCiolZbgD/uJkwD8A2IB6Gd/SpUDS
         AdmOgDoHFEtSVf8hn9Rz/eRfEgfKhLbPWQwKGrmRetfcoWRrTOKKU5WY62woqEW33t
         wKLRe0J+bP379N06IOqps9RRSpsGU5IIWYzUcVW0=


Signature Information:
v= Version: 1
a= Algorithm: rsa-sha256
c= Method: relaxed/simple
d= Domain: mail.marlborosurvey.net
s= Selector: mail
q= Protocol:
bh= frcCV1k9oG9oKj3dpUqdJg1PxRT2RSN/XKdLCPjaYaY=
h= Signed Headers: Date:From:Message-Id:To
b= Data: ne4uSkDYbE9cwS65BJsfiYwuO8l72lDmfMq+YCiolZbgD/uJkwD8A2IB6Gd/SpUDS
         AdmOgDoHFEtSVf8hn9Rz/eRfEgfKhLbPWQwKGrmRetfcoWRrTOKKU5WY62woqEW33t
         wKLRe0J+bP379N06IOqps9RRSpsGU5IIWYzUcVW0=
Public Key DNS Lookup
Building DNS Query for mail._domainkey.mail.marlborosurvey.net
Retrieved this publickey from DNS:
Validating Signature
result = invalid
Details: public key: not available

and the email itself:

Return-Path: <root_at_marlborosurvey.net>
X-Original-To: pYYPEv3cs7_at_www.brandonchecketts.com
Delivered-To: spamapp_at_www.brandonchecketts.com
Received: from mail.marlborosurvey.net (mail.marlborosurvey.net [64.0.29.71])
        by www.brandonchecketts.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E252429F
        for <pYYPEv3cs7_at_www.brandonchecketts.com>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:37:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.marlborosurvey.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
        by mail.marlborosurvey.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9QMb1T3008349
        for <pYYPEv3cs7_at_www.brandonchecketts.com>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:37:01 -0600
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;
        d=mail.marlborosurvey.net; s=mail; t=1288132621;
        bh=frcCV1k9oG9oKj3dpUqdJg1PxRT2RSN/XKdLCPjaYaY=;
        h=Date:From:Message-Id:To;
        z=Date:=20Tue,=2026=20Oct=202010=2016:37:01=20-0600|From:=20root=20
         <root_at_mail.marlborosurvey.net>|Message-Id:=20<201010262237.o9QMb1x
         d008348_at_mail.marlborosurvey.net>|To:=20pYYPEv3cs7_at_www.brandoncheck
         etts.com;
        b=ne4uSkDYbE9cwS65BJsfiYwuO8l72lDmfMq+YCiolZbgD/uJkwD8A2IB6Gd/SpUDS
         AdmOgDoHFEtSVf8hn9Rz/eRfEgfKhLbPWQwKGrmRetfcoWRrTOKKU5WY62woqEW33t
         wKLRe0J+bP379N06IOqps9RRSpsGU5IIWYzUcVW0=
Received: (from root_at_localhost)
        by mail.marlborosurvey.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o9QMb1xd008348
        for pYYPEv3cs7_at_www.brandonchecketts.com; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:37:01 -0600
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:37:01 -0600
From: root <root_at_marlborosurvey.net>
Message-Id: <201010262237.o9QMb1xd008348_at_mail.marlborosurvey.net>
To: pYYPEv3cs7_at_www.brandonchecketts.com

From: steve_at_stevejenkins.com
To: nosaj_17_at_hotmail.com
CC: opendkim-users_at_lists.opendkim.org
Subject: RE: Signing problem
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:34:21 -0700



















Hey, Jason. I also like using this to test:

 

http://www.brandonchecketts.com/emailtest.php

 

SteveJ

 





From:
opendkim-users-bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org [mailto:opendkim-users-bounce_at_lists.opendkim.org]
On Behalf Of Jason Clint

Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 3:21 PM

To: tlyons_at_ivenue.com

Cc: opendkim-users_at_lists.opendkim.org

Subject: RE: Signing problem





 

apparently sendmail is starting to get sick
of me:



Oct 26 16:16:03 mail sendmail[6668]: o9QMG3VX006668: from=root, size=26,
class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<201010262216.o9QMG3VX006668_at_mail.marlborosurvey.net>,
relay=root_at_localhost

Oct 26 16:16:03 mail sendmail[6669]: o9QMG3SJ006669:
from=<root_at_mail.marlborosurvey.net>, size=332, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<201010262216.o9QMG3VX006668_at_mail.marlborosurvey.net>, proto=ESMTP,
daemon=MTA, relay=localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]

Oct 26 16:16:03 mail sendmail[6669]: o9QMG3SJ006669: Milter insert (1): header:
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256;
c=relaxed/simple;\n\td=mail.marlborosurvey.net; s=mail; t=1288131363;\n\tbh=frcCV1k9oG9oKj3dpUqdJg1PxRT2RSN/XKdLCPjaYaY=;\n\th=Date:From:Message-Id:To;\n\tz=Date:=20Tue,=2026=20Oct=202010=2016:16:03=20-0600|From:=20root=20\n\t
<root_at_mail.marlborosurvey.net>|Message-Id:=20<201010262216.o9QMG3V\n\t
X006668_at_mail.marlborosurvey.net>|To:=20sa-test_at_sendmail.net;\n\tb=DQ8aTRbSD2BwKTo8DQoqyrPbFs5xoDkQIodZmuJvfJ93GGUfANjXoTSGINdS14EGN\n\t
F4BeCntzj1A7GW1qeEWXIi2cbT6/I4L3AAzWkqkutS5hxm/76ljxZ4lX8bnK5ma6jz\n\t
t+V/MnxHKfbnU8quKhQHzjnxqHLTegIF30b40eEw=

Oct 26 16:16:03 mail sendmail[6668]: o9QMG3VX006668: to=sa-test_at_sendmail.net,
ctladdr=root (0/0), delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=30026,
relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (o9QMG3SJ006669 Message
accepted for delivery)

Oct 26 16:16:04 mail sendmail[6672]: STARTTLS=client, relay=smtp.sendmail.net.,
version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=FAIL, cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA, bits=256/256

Oct 26 16:16:05 mail sendmail[6672]: o9QMG3SJ006669:
to=<sa-test_at_sendmail.net>, ctladdr=<root_at_mail.marlborosurvey.net>
(0/0), delay=00:00:02, xdelay=00:00:02, mailer=esmtp, pri=120332,
relay=smtp.sendmail.net. [209.246.26.21], dsn=4.0.0,
stat=Deferred: 451 4.3.2 Please try again later





I will have to check on it in a minute!







From:
nosaj_17_at_hotmail.com

To: tlyons_at_ivenue.com

CC: opendkim-users_at_lists.opendkim.org

Subject: RE: Signing problem

Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:17:29 +0000



Just so you know its not whats in the log that bothers me but the response I
get back from sa-test_at_sendmail.net which is.......check that, I just looked
at the last log entry and saw this:



We hope this service has been helpful to you.



Authentication System: DomainKeys
Identified Mail

  
Result:
DKIM signature confirmed GOOD

  
Description:
Signature verified, message arrived intact

   Reporting
host:
sendmail.net

   More information:
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/

   Sendmail
milter:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/dkim-milter/





give me a second while I verify if its right and I didn't just doze off and
dream it started working.







> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:11:27 -0700

> Subject: Re: Signing problem

> From: tlyons_at_ivenue.com

> To: nosaj_17_at_hotmail.com

> CC: opendkim-users_at_lists.opendkim.org

>

> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Jason Clint <nosaj_17_at_hotmail.com>
wrote:

> > Another update, setting the Domain to

> > marlborosurvey.net,mail.marlborosurvey.net gets rid of the other
errro:

> > Oct 26 15:07:44 mail opendkim[6446]: o9QL7iJ8006451: no signing
domain match

> > for `mail.marlborosurvey.net'

>

> I just wanted to point out that what you are seeing is not an
"error",

> it's debug output caused by the "LogWhy" statement being enabled
in

> your opendkim configuration.

>

> Murray, maybe a log identifier to indicate it's debug output and not

> an error would be beneficial. I'm torn though...

>

> --

> Regards... Todd

> I seek the truth...it is only persistence in self-delusion and

> ignorance that does harm. -- Marcus Aurealius

>

>

                                               
Received on Tue Oct 26 2010 - 22:43:01 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 29 2012 - 23:19:49 PST