RE: OpenDKIM 2.1.3 fails to start due to KeyFile and Selector problems

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_cloudmark.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:37:12 -0700

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rolf E. Sonneveld [mailto:R.E.Sonneveld_at_sonnection.nl]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 12:23 PM
> To: Murray S. Kucherawy
> Cc: opendkim-users_at_lists.opendkim.org
> Subject: Re: OpenDKIM 2.1.3 fails to start due to KeyFile and Selector
> problems
>
> > The configuration should refuse that as well; KeyTable includes the
> signing domains, so there's no need to set Domain.
>
> May I suggest to document this mutual exclusiveness either with Domain
> or with KeyTable or both?

Sure; the opendkim.conf(5) man page now states that both Selector and Domain are ignored if KeyTable is set. It already said that about KeyFile.

> > I'll clean this up a little for 2.2.0.
>
> And shouldn't KeyFile and Selector also be ignored when SigningTable is
> defined, or is that already implemented?

You already can't define a SigningTable without a KeyTable, so I think we're OK there.
Received on Tue Aug 10 2010 - 20:37:21 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tue Aug 10 2010 - 20:50:00 PST