RE: Some very early implementation report details from OpenDKIM

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_cloudmark.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:39:54 -0700

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alessandro Vesely [mailto:vesely_at_tana.it]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 3:41 AM
> To: Murray S. Kucherawy
> Cc: opendkim-users_at_lists.opendkim.org
> Subject: Re: Some very early implementation report details from
> OpenDKIM
>
> In a number of cases it is sufficient. The percentage of multipart
> messages
> may be meaningful on its own. I mean, counting each of these three
> categories may provide some insight. Knowing that there is a relevant
> number
> of 8bit-signer would be interesting, even if that statistic will be
> limited
> to single-part messages. (Restricting to English messages is a more
> significant limitation.)
>
> I think it is beyond scope to check whether 8BITMIME was declared, or
> actually needed, as well as parsing the full structure.

OK, we should be able to do this with the new schema I've come up with for v2.2.0. Now I just have to find time to update the code and start testing it.

The new code can be told to record per-message the Content-Type (including character set) and Content-Transfer-Encoding.
Received on Tue Aug 10 2010 - 16:40:03 PST