Re: Collection of DKIM statistics

From: Andreas Schulze <sca_at_andreasschulze.de>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:15:39 +0200

Am 30.07.2010 01:15 schrieb Murray S. Kucherawy:
> Among the information this will allow us to produce:
>
> - how many domains are not signing
> - how many domains are signing
> - how many domains are signing with multiple signatures
> - how many signatures are surviving
> - which canonicalizations are popular
> - whether failures can be associated with header changes or body changes
> - use of various signature features (t=, l=, x=, z=)
> - how many messages that use "l=" were extended
> - use of key features (g=, t=)
> - count of keys that had syntax errors
> - count of syntactically invalid signatures
> - count of third-party signatures
> - count of Received: header fields on signed mail
> - how many messages you get that appear to come via lists
> - signature survival on list mail vs. regular mail
> - how many domains advertise ADSP records, which ones, and pass/fail rates
>
Do you plan to publish the collected data ?
would be interesting ...

Andreas

-- 
########################################################################
#
# Andreas Schulze
# https://andreasschulze.de
# 
# GnuPG Key-ID: A7DBA67F, https://andreasschulze.de/sca.asc
# GnuPG Fingerprint: 14C1 39A8 CE6D 6BE0 28C6 5652 03B5 6793 A7DB A67F
#
# $Id: .signature,v 1.3 2007-12-27 21:13:36 sca Exp $
########################################################################
Received on Fri Jul 30 2010 - 20:15:42 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Fri Jul 30 2010 - 20:50:00 PST