Re: [dkim-ops] no signature data on the log

From: Murat ALTIPARMAK <murataltiparmak_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:16:56 +0200

Hi Murray,

As far as I understand, although we applied DKIM according to the relating
RFC, library and etc. Yahoo is feeling free to process signed emails that we
sent. I found the following program, may be after we registered the
following program, Yahoo will populate the DKIM symbol and tooltip besides
our signed mails sent to Yahoo.

http://feedbackloop.yahoo.net/

Thank you again for your valuable contribution and help. I appreciate really
your response.

On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_blackops.org>wrote:

> On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Murat ALTIPARMAK wrote:
>
>> I am a little bit confused because I finally succeeded in signing the
>> messages from my domain thanks to you and sent successfully to signed
>> e-mail
>> to gmail.com. However, the same e-mail is reaching to yahoo but it is not
>> being treated as signed by Yahoo although DKIM-Signature is available in
>> the
>> header.
>>
>
> Based on the Authentication-Results: header field Yahoo! is adding on
> delivery, your mail is signed and is being properly validated (note the
> "dkim=pass"). However, what Yahoo! does with that information is not
> something we can influence. They could choose to ignore it entirely if they
> want to do so.
>
>
> As the name states, opendkim should be open to every mail provider
>> and am I not right about that?
>>
>
> It is, and in fact Yahoo! is using the libopendkim library, the same code
> you just compiled.
>
>
> Why is not Yahoo accepting the same mail as signed?
>>
>
> The header you included shows that they are accepting it as signed. What
> they're doing with signed mail though is a different question, and isn't
> something we can answer.
>
>
> Is there a time interval for a domain to start sending signed mails
>> to Yahoo?
>>
>
> That's a matter of Yahoo's local policy. There's no way for us to know
> what they're doing inside their systems with the result of DKIM
> verification. I wouldn't be surprised, though, to discover there's some
> period of time before which they will begin trusting your signatures.
> There's nothing stopping spammers from signing their mail, so perhaps they
> want to wait and see how your domain behaves before giving your signed mail
> some preferential treatment.
>
>
> Should I open a support ticket?
>>
>
> I don't know what the right course of action would be. Do they have web
> pages about how they handle DKIM?
>
> -MSK
>
Received on Sat Mar 13 2010 - 00:17:12 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sat Mar 13 2010 - 02:50:01 PST