Re: OpenDKIM 2.11.0 Alpha release available (fwd)

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_blackops.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 00:15:50 -0800 (PST)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2015 23:41:58 -0800 (PST)
From: Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_blackops.org>
To: A. Schulze <sca_at_andreasschulze.de>
Cc: opendkim-dev_at_lists.opendkim.org
Subject: Re: OpenDKIM 2.11.0 Alpha release available

On Sat, 24 Oct 2015, A. Schulze wrote:
> I now found a configuration where OpenDKIM generate a v=2 signature.
>
> opendkim-2.11.0.conf:
> ConditionalSignatures file:/path/to/conditional_table
>
> conditional_table:
> sender.domain:destination.domain x
>
> _at_Murray: Is this the intended way to configure conditional signatures?

Yes, that's the way to activate the experiment.

> But the 'classic' opendkim _at_destination.domain fail to validate:
>
> Oct 24 12:32:28 destination opendkim[29449]: 3njdzJ4ZYgz7tBQ: syntax error:
> syntax error in signature data (ASCII 0x21 at offset 99)

Right, it won't know the syntax.

> It may be possible that this is a consequence of the ignorance that test155
> fail. I disabled "make check" to build opendkim-2.11.0.alpha0 ...

Nope, that's an unrelated problem. (The unit test somehow has "!fs" which was
the original name of "!cd", so that signature won't work. The fixed test is
available via git.).

-MSK
Received on Mon Nov 02 2015 - 08:16:06 PST