Re: OpenDKIM 2.9.0 Beta1 available

From: Todd Lyons <tlyons_at_ivenue.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:13:53 -0800

On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Andreas Schulze <sca_at_andreasschulze.de> wrote:
> Am 26.11.2013 01:27 schrieb Murray S. Kucherawy:
>> Changes since Beta0:

> # opendkim -V
> opendkim: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.0
> Compiled with OpenSSL 0.9.8o 01 Jun 2010
> SMFI_VERSION 0x1000001
> libmilter version 1.0.1
> Supported signing algorithms:
> rsa-sha1
> rsa-sha256
> Supported canonicalization algorithms:
> relaxed
> simple
> Active code options:
> USE_DB
> USE_JANSSON
> USE_LDAP
> USE_ODBX
> USE_UNBOUND
> _FFR_DIFFHEADERS
> _FFR_IDENTITY_HEADER
> _FFR_RATE_LIMIT
> _FFR_REDIRECT
> _FFR_REPRRD
> _FFR_REPUTATION
> _FFR_SENDER_MACRO
> _FFR_STATS
> libopendkim 2.9.0: diffheaders debug

FWIW, my Beta1 is working well as well:

# opendkim -V
opendkim: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.0
    Compiled with OpenSSL 0.9.8o 01 Jun 2010
    SMFI_VERSION 0x1000001
    libmilter version 1.0.1
    Supported signing algorithms:
        rsa-sha1
        rsa-sha256
    Supported canonicalization algorithms:
        relaxed
        simple
    Active code options:
        USE_DB
        USE_JANSSON
        USE_LUA
        USE_ODBX
        USE_UNBOUND
        _FFR_ADSP_LISTS
        _FFR_ATPS
        _FFR_DIFFHEADERS
        _FFR_RATE_LIMIT
        _FFR_REDIRECT
        _FFR_REPUTATION
        _FFR_SENDER_MACRO
        _FFR_STATS
        _FFR_STATSEXT
    libopendkim 2.9.0: atps diffheaders debug

...Todd
-- 
The total budget at all receivers for solving senders' problems is $0.
 If you want them to accept your mail and manage it the way you want,
send it the way the spec says to. --John Levine
Received on Wed Nov 27 2013 - 19:14:13 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Nov 27 2013 - 19:18:01 PST