Re: Use of ADSP

From: Andreas Schulze <sca_at_andreasschulze.de>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 20:22:44 +0200

Zitat von "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk_at_blackops.org>:

> There's been a proposal put forth in the standards community to move ADSP
> (RFC5617) to Historic status from Proposed Standard.
I already voted for historical :-)

> 1a) If you use OpenDKIM as a filter, do you have it enabled (the default)
> and set to reject (not the default)?
yes, no

> 1b) If you use OpenDKIM as a filter with ADSP enabled and do not reject, it
> adds an Authentication-Results header field indicating the failure. Do you
> do anything with that?
no

> 2a) Do you use libopendkim directly? Specifically, do you call
> dkim_policy() and related functions to do ADSP checking?
no

> 2b) Do you act on the result, or merely attach it to the message so
> something downstream can handle it?
no

After removing my _adsp dns records I consider recompiling
my opendkim. (--disable-atps, --disable-adsp_lists)

Andreas
Received on Sat Sep 14 2013 - 18:22:59 PST