Re: contrib/spec/opendkim.spec.in

From: Scott Kitterman <ietf-dkim_at_kitterman.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 07:56:51 -0400

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk_at_blackops.org> wrote:

>On Sat, 23 Mar 2013, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> For Debian and derivatives (such as Ubuntu), the spec file is
>> irrelevant. I did test build the head of the develop branch to check
>
>> the configure.ac changes and it builds fine. I do see a number of
>new
>> documentation files for 2.8.2. Was that intended:
>>
>> /usr/share/doc/libopendkim-dev/docs/dkim_atps_check.html
>> /usr/share/doc/libopendkim-dev/docs/dkim_atps_t.html
>> /usr/share/doc/libopendkim-dev/docs/dkim_getsslbuf.html
>> /usr/share/doc/libopendkim-dev/docs/dkim_set_trust_anchor.html
>> /usr/share/doc/libopendkim-dev/docs/dkim_sig_gethashes.html
>> /usr/share/doc/libopendkim-dev/docs/dkim_sig_getsslbuf.html
>> /usr/share/doc/libopendkim-dev/docs/dkim_sig_seterror.html
>> /usr/share/doc/libopendkim-dev/docs/dkim_signhdrs.html
>
>None of those are new, nor were they recently added to packaging.
>However, they aren't listed in libopendkim/docs/Makefile.am either.
>Did
>something on your side of packaging just add those files automatically?

Apparently. Someone probably improved something. Should they be in the Makefile?

Scott K
Received on Sun Mar 24 2013 - 11:57:06 PST