Re: test with 4k dkim signing key

From: Benny Pedersen <me_at_junc.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 03:45:24 +0100

Andreas Schulze skrev den 05-11-2012 23:17:

>> without dnssec its silly to force big dkim key sizes
> could you explain the reason?

i will try:

mx.elandsys.com; dkim=pass reason="4096-bit key; insecure key"
header.i=_at_andreasschulze.de header.b=Tqro4tYW; dkim-adsp=pass

where do insecure key come from ?

does whois show your domain is dnssec enblad ?

whois junc.org last line says its disabled for my domain, is opendkim
check this ?

> btw: signing-milter.org *is* dnssec enabled...

this is another problem :)

>> properly i am stoc with 1024 now
> thats fine for today. But what about next week/month/year/decade?

i find it more intresting to see who wins electron in usa right now :)
Received on Wed Nov 07 2012 - 02:45:40 PST