Re: Multiple instances of a header field

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_blackops.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 17:12:05 -0700 (PDT)

On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Ken Murchison wrote:
> As an alternative to changing the dkim_header() behavior, here is a
> patch that reverses the order of the headers when using dkim_chunk() so
> that they get processed last-to-first.

Have you found that this is necessary? If it is, there's probably a bug
with dkim_chunk(), because it works fine through the more traditional
interface. But really, dkim_chunk() just breaks the header and body
apart and then feeds them in-order to the other parts of the API, so this
should not be a problem in either case.

-MSK
Received on Sat Jun 09 2012 - 00:12:21 PST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 29 2012 - 23:33:33 PST