Re: minor bug in 2.5.0

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Murray S. Kucherawy <msk_at_blackops.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 19:46:15 -0800 (PST)

On Fri, 9 Mar 2012, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
>> That's deliberate, since sendmail and postfix will add one for you.
>
> Spam filters note a missing Date:-header as indicator of spammity.

Even for local submissions?
Received on Sat Mar 10 2012 - 03:46:30 PST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: SM: "Re: ttl undefined in libopendkim/dkim-report.c"
Previous message: Murray S. Kucherawy: "Re: next minor bug"
In reply to: Patrick Ben Koetter: "Re: minor bug in 2.5.0"
Next in thread: Patrick Ben Koetter: "Re: minor bug in 2.5.0"
Reply: Patrick Ben Koetter: "Re: minor bug in 2.5.0"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Oct 29 2012 - 23:33:31 PST